Hong Kong instead
Carrying out the arrangement suggested in my despatch of the 21st last March.
1.2. I have carefully considered the arguments set forth in your despatch in favour of the appointment of a military adjutant but I am not satisfied that this appointment is required and that the proposals made in my former despatch will not adequately meet the case.
3. Mr. Honspool in his letter of the 5th May refuses the terms which have been offered to him. He asks that his pay, which is at present £1440 per annum, may be increased together with a command allowance.
A?
$
Hong Hong instead
Carrying
of
out the arrangement
Suggested in my despatch
the 21
last.
?
st
March of
1.2. I have comefully emsidered the arguments
you despatchn
Set fortte in you
favour of the appoint.
ix
-ment
of a military
adjutant but I am not
Satisfied extras that this
appointment is required
*
ฟร
and
517
on that the come to thich
rasaliks proposals mode in
my furcions despatch will
not
4 adequately mact the
Casei
.3. M. Honspool
7
the 5th
in his letter
of May
refuses the terms which have been offered
d to him.
he asthe that his pay
may
which is at present
equad #1440 per
Annum
good
Webgether with a
conduct allowance
ๆ
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.